Racquet Ball Launcher Project — Milestone 6 of 6
This is where the project closes the loop — the Reflect stage of Session 1's design cycle, run for real, at full scale, over an entire quarter.
A team that missed targets on Field Test Day but can clearly diagnose why demonstrates the same competency as a team that hit all three. Misses are valuable material here, not something to minimize.
A team that hit all three targets doesn't get to skip real reflection either — your model's actual limitations are still worth surfacing, win or lose.
Prepare a short presentation or written defense — check with your instructor which format — covering all four of these:
Which one you chose, and why — reference your actual Session 15–16 reasoning, not a retroactive justification that sounds better now.
Summarize your calibration model from Sessions 21–23, and how it changed after Sessions 24–25's iteration.
State your results honestly, misses included. For any miss, give a specific diagnosis — a model limitation at the edge of your usable range, field conditions, inconsistent execution — not a vague "we were off."
Submit your full notebook, showing the model's evolution from your first Session 15–16 entry through today — not just a polished final summary.
Before you present or submit, confirm:
Answer the following questions before submitting your work.
Submit your presentation or written defense, and your complete design notebook.