Racquet Ball Launcher Project — Milestone 6 of 6
This is the project's final reflection. You reflected inside every Test → Reflect → Iterate loop; now step back from the entire quarter and decide what carries forward.
A team that missed targets on Field Test Day but can clearly diagnose why demonstrates the same competency as a team that hit all three. Misses are valuable material here, not something to minimize.
A team that hit all three targets doesn't get to skip real reflection either — your model's actual limitations are still worth surfacing, win or lose.
Prepare a short presentation or written defense — check with your instructor which format — covering all four of these:
Which one you chose, and why — reference your actual Session 14–15 reasoning, not a retroactive justification that sounds better now.
Summarize your calibration model from Sessions 20–22, and how it changed after Sessions 23–24's iteration.
State your results honestly, misses included. For any miss, give a specific diagnosis — a model limitation at the edge of your usable range, field conditions, inconsistent execution — not a vague "we were off."
Submit your full notebook, showing the model's evolution from your first Session 14–15 entry through today — not just a polished final summary.
Before you present or submit, confirm:
Answer these on your own. Reflections are individual, even when the rest of the session was team work.
Submit your presentation or written defense, and your complete design notebook.